Thursday, March 24, 2016

Lost Opportunity

"The Good Wife" is becoming a bad girl.

That’s just part of it. 

Grace’s maturity makes her mother’s school-girlish, over-the-top, giggly advances towards her current flame, Jason, seem even more ridiculous. Eroticism, no. Embarrassing, yes.  To believe that a forty-something well-respected and professionally successful woman -- the governor’s wife, no less -- would compromise herself and her staff in order to indulge in a lewd and unnecessary scene of public sex, is not only ludicrous, it is stupid. 

But that’s not all that’s stupid! The intellectually bland and boring drip of this season's scripts, filled with sex, careless decisions, betrayal of long standing friendships,  and stupid, STUPID, antics of previously sensitively portrayed characters in the series, is unforgivable.   

To wit: the judge who spends an entire scene on his hands and knees trying to swat ants or some kind of bugs from under the desk – while conducting a session in court; the brilliant (but quirky) female attorney who performs Yoga postures while conducting a business meeting; her former husband, another attorney played by an otherwise believable actor, who cuddles his pet pooch wherever he goes – even while pacing the hallowed halls of the Courthouse.  And lastly, dear Eli, who is still standing on an upturned trash can in order to eaves-drop on hearings through the vent in the handicapped bathroom.

It is sad to see the decline of a once intellectually entertaining series that was believable and viable – and, on broadcast TV.  What a wasted opportunity to be relevant!  

Thank goodness for "Madame Secretary.'







Wednesday, February 3, 2016

A Day at the Zoo


Sunday, November 22, 2015

JFK Remembered November 22, 1963

See my post from November 22, 2014


Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Complexities of the English Language- a reprise.


With the undaunted and continuous reporting on every aspect of our world – both political and personal – as a result of the “twenty-four-hour-news cycle,” certain phrases appear again and again in our Media ad nauseum.   It isn’t just the “talking heads” who commit the sin of “pundit drivel.” It’s the supposed “experts” of all fields whom the pundits interview.  

We are being proselytized on a daily basis to thinking in terms of the clichéd cliché.
Here are few that have come to make me cringe:  

“. . .having said that...”

“. . .that being said. . .”

“. . .at the end of the day. . .”

“. . .we’ll get to that on the other side. . .” (of the commercial break).

“. . .he allegedly. . .” (did something like cross the street).  

". . .whatever. . ."

". . . it is what it is . . ."  

“. . .what were (are) your feelings. . .?” (asked of someone who can hardly speak because of being choked up with tears after a tragedy in their lives).

". . .sorry for your loss  . . ."

". . .what was going through your mind . . .? (when the gunman shoved the gun in your face). 

“. . . let’s DO this. . .”

“. . . be that as it may. . .”

“. . . so . . . “  (a word currently used to preface the answer to a question – Mike Morell should know better!)

“. . . like . . . “  (Oh, please, let’s get rid of this word used to begin a sentence or to fill a pause.  Like, I'd be over-joyed!)  

“. . . I know what the optics are. . .” The White House Staff uses “optics” a lot.  How about something like, “. . . I know how this appears. . .”

Appearances do matter and so do words.

My latest peeve, however, is the use of “complex” when the speaker means “complicated.”  Yes, the dictionary makes it sound like they are interchangeable.  However, there is a subtle difference in the connotation of the words.  In the case of the word “complex” the connotation is and has always been one of the following: containing multiple interconnected parts; a composite; multi-faceted; a complex system of something.  

"Complicated," on the other hand, is not that complicated -- it connotes difficult to understand, analyze, explain or follow.

Am I the only one who gets rankled with the sloppy use of "I" and "me," "he" and "him" as well as "she" and "her?"  One should give it to "me;" therefore, one should also give it to "him and me" or "her and me."  Please don't let one give it to "her and I," since one would never give it to "I," would they?   I guess it's just me!  

Next up:  my rant on Pharmaceutical commercials.  I’ll bet you can’t wait! 

Monday, May 4, 2015

Nineteen Eighty Four Revisited

I am writing my memoirs and by doing so, I discovered that I am a rebel.  It's not that I never knew I was a rebel, but because of the process of writing, I've decided to own up to it. 
Being rebellious is not a negative thing though it does sometimes mean going in the opposite directions of the general drift of society or established opinion.    

I never saw myself as a political rebel, though I must say that today I feel that the more corporate America takes over almost every facet of our lives, including buying our “elected” officials, the more we are thrust into having to submit to regulatory restrictions, and the more “big brother” interferes with the truly personal choices of our lives, the more I think we should rebel.

I am not suggesting we take up arms and start an insurrection but I do recommend thinking about some of the propaganda we’re exposed to on a daily basis simply by watching television.  We're being brainwashed either by the commercials or the lies our politicians toss out there, freely and without remorse or regret. It is immoral and degrading.  But, it’s just politics, right?  And, I don’t need to remind you that there are at least 10 minutes of commercials in every half hour of content. Think about it!  We, the public, are supposed to own the air waves. 

Included are the news media. All of our broadcast networks as well as CNN have basically the same news content which they regurgitate over and over ad nauseum especially if it is salacious or has a racial component; to wit, Ferguson and Baltimore.  There are real journalists out there, but I rarely see them on our news channels. Anything that is the least bit sensational will take precedence over "hard" news.  

As a rebel, I have stopped watching the standard networks. I watch the BBC, The DW from Berlin or Al Jazeera America.  At least I can find out what is going on in the rest of the world.

I have to admire the so-called “free range” parents who had the audacity to allow their children to walk home alone and were turned in by (no doubt) well meaning neighbors. Of course there are sick people out there and we should protect our kids, but we cannot hover over them for the rest of their lives keeping them safe from every event that might occur in the future. These parents are considered deviant.  Or are they just rebels?     

It takes courage to be a rebel because as a rebel, you are taking a risk, putting yourself out there, opening yourself up to criticism, or even derision. If we err against the current mantra of "political correctness" we are in danger of becoming a victim of the "thought police."  

Have we indeed become the fictional society imagined by George Orwell, controlled by newspeak and afraid to utter a thoughtcrime? 

Read. Think. Write letters. Boycott.  Speak out against the pap shoved down our throats by media, politicians and their corporate bosses.  Speak out against the utter lack of accountability, against sameness and conformity.  

Be a rebel.  









  


Saturday, March 14, 2015

Open Letter to Israel

                     

I am an American woman and U.S. citizen – a staunch supporter of Israel. 
I’ve admired the Israeli people for years -- long after I got over my teenage infatuation with Ari ben Canaan (Exodus, 1958).  For years, I fervently believed in the courage and fearlessness of the early underground, Haganah (IDF), the inherent romantic ideal of the Sabra and the immensely sensible structure of the Kibbutzim.  
Your people brought forth a veritable garden from the dry and rocky Negev Desert.  You elected the miraculously astute Golda Meir as your Prime Minister long before most countries would take their women seriously as political leaders.  And, you allowed your women to fight.  This is a country to be proud of, I remember thinking – you were resourceful, brainy and courageous.

But then, you elected Benjamin Netanyahu as your Prime Minister and I began to doubt.  Netanyahu appears to have no desire for the peace process.  I believe that he hates the Arabs and thinks the only thing they understand is force; to wit, the long-standing wars and the continued illegal settlements. He is pompous, he is arrogant; he is a destroyer, not a builder.  

I have come to despise his muscle-flexing and his interminable fear-mongering over Iran.

And now, after his duplicitous behavior in concert with our Speaker of the House of Representatives, I believe he is not only careless, by his reckless interference in our political system, but is a danger to our country as well as yours.

Bradley Burston in a recent piece in Ha’aretz, says of your prime minister  “. . . he has poisoned his country. Israel is broken and battered and weak with fear... His legacy is decay."

If you re-elect Benjamin Netanyahu, he and his bellicose defense minister, Avignor Lieberman could take us ALL to war with Iran, as we Americans will never be far from our greatest ally -- you. However, I do not want more war and I do not believe that the majority of your people want war. 

And that is why I feel I must speak to you.  I do not wish to interfere in the internal politics of Israel – I speak only because your decision has a direct bearing on my life and the lives of my children.

Please do not allow Benjamin Netanyahu and his war-mongering party this opportunity. Please remind me and the rest of the world that Israel is made of sterner stuff.  Show us the gutsy, courageous and dynamic people you have always been.    

Make the change!